Reasons I ditched Orchard when developing a 50k page website: The Orchard CMS import tool is simply too slow. In this post I’ll share some high-level notes on key differences between these two CMS’. Our reports are updated daily. Make sure you’re aware of the critical differences between the two. Drupal. I have some familiarity with SiteCore. Of course you get less features, more bugs, not much docs and no free support. Save See this . Episerver has its own plugin to be installed on Visual Studio to help on the development too. (See Saying no to Orchard). OK so the guy who wrote that is an Episerver consultant but it's interesting and balanced. Takeaway: Compared to a natively integrated vendor like Sitecore, Episerver is closer to a provider of multiple siloed tools – particularly when it comes to campaigns and personalization. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. I can only comment mainly on Sitecore and a bit on Umbraco from my knowledge of others using it: Sitecore is an enterprise level web CMS with an "enterprise price tag." Consider which factors are important to you and make an informed decision. When it comes to empowering marketing and commerce teams to create and deliver customer experiences that are personal, memorable, and provide ROI, there are critical differences you should be aware of. Unfortunately, I started What this means is that with Episerver, implementing and maintaining an integrated platform with the functionality you need is no simple task. Junior Developers, Intermediate Developers and senior developers can all handle Episerver with ease. We reviewed Sitecore and Episerver several years back and made the choice to partner with Episerver because we believed Episerver’s ability to support efficient upgrades along with a strong B2B commerce and content framework and innovative search and personalization tools was the best fit for our customers. That’s what we have done at Sitecore. The winner of Sitecore vs Episerver is… It can be extremely difficult when comparing two top-tier platforms such as Sitecore and Episerver. See more Web Content Management companies. It's very extensible, has a lot of developer/community support, and is very developer friendly. CMS is deeply configurable and highly extensible, it has clever publishing and caching system, powerful search and page editor. Make sure you’re aware of the critical differences between the two. In comparison, Episerver’s acquired products (including Optivo for marketing campaigns and Peerius for personalization) are still more siloed than seamless. I have only heard positive feedback about EPiServer. Reviewed in Last 12 Months The capabilities in Sitecore® Experience Platform™ and Sitecore Experience Commerce™ are all natively integrated. It’s free! Consider which factors are important to you and make an informed decision. Sitecore on the other hand seems to be designed for advanced developers. 160 verified user reviews and ratings of features, pros, cons, pricing, support and more. Choose a platform that enables you to experiment, create and innovate without disruption. I only just got wind of Orchard the other day. FILTER BY: Company Size Industry Region. Sitecore sounds like a great product if you look at the specs, almost every "marketing" feature is on board, but my experience is that implementing those features is hard, and often not well documented, not to … All Rights Reserved Sitecore has content database and website database separated which make it by nature easily to scale up. Orchard currently still has some glaring gaps in the out-of-the box experience (limited control over how to sort and filter lists of content, only text fields) but you can develop just about anything yourself on top of that and it's an amazing piece of work in how it's been architected so I feel it bodes well for the future from a purely developer perspective. But it's not so extensible and configurable, has pure search (without expensive EPiFind module) and generally lower-featured comparing to Sitecore. So this will be a long journey until you understand it good and make a good support of all its features for editors. Episerver has a digital asset management (DAM) add-on. comparison of Episerver CMS vs. Umbraco. Both are Scandinavian-born companies with a web content management (WCM) heritage and strong connections to the Microsoft ecosystem. Including Computers Electronics & Technology, Science & Education, Finance, Travel & Tourism and 20 other categories. Reviewer(s) 1 1. Including Computers Electronics & Technology, Science & Education, Finance, Travel & Tourism and 20 other categories. Most business recognize how essential personalized experiences are today. Episerver on the other hand is quite expensive and has no free options. If you’re considering Episerver, be sure to vet their partner recommendation very carefully. We are here to improve the whole process of reviewing Content Management Software products for you. I like the way they allow me to build systems that really work well for my customers. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5048738/choosing-a-cms-episerver-vs-orchard-vs-sitecore-vs-umbraco/5055272#5055272. But the reality is that each developer has their own taste and the style of CMS they like to work with. Do you need a natively integrated solution, robust community and partner networks, a content creation platform, or all of the above? Content Management Systems, or CMS for short, are applications that provide companies and individual users with the ability to manage the content, information, or analytical data of a website, or internet application. Umbraco is also built on ASP.NET like Sitecore. Sitecore Rocks is a fantastic tool commonly used to help with the integration between Visual Studio and Sitecore. Their flexibility, functionality, integration capabilities and ease of use is why we have chosen to focus our technical expertise on these systems. Make sure you’re aware of the critical differences between the two. I feel Umbraco has much more community content (1300 packages … By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, 2020 Stack Exchange, Inc. user contributions under cc by-sa. Compare Sitecore vs Umbraco CMS. But I'm not agree with that opinion, Umbraco is free but great CMS )) Episerver vs Sitecore + OptimizeTest EMAIL PAGE. Today, Episerver boasts a variety of B2B and B2C commerce customers. Episerver vs Sitecore. As I know, Umbraco is pretty similar to EPiServer and Sitecore, but free and open source. This is why Sitecore’s Solution Provider Partner program includes nearly 800 partners, including global, regional, and local digital agencies, systems integrators, and consultancies. This report shows the usage statistics of Sitecore CMS vs. EPiServer CMS as content management system on the web. We compared these products and thousands more to help professionals like you find the perfect solution for your business. Umbraco vs Sitecore. Of course you get less features, more bugs, not much docs and no free support. For instance, on this page you can examine the overall performance of Sitecore (9.0) and contrast it with the overall performance of Kentico (8.8). Umbraco by itself is free to use, both personal and for business. ... Episerver Customer-Centric Digital Experience Platform... 5 (0 reviews) Jul 9, 2020. It would only accept With many Fortune 500 clients, Sitecore products are used for single websites to large scale, multi-tenant installations. You may also compare their overall score (8.6 for Episerver vs. 9.0 for Sitecore) and overall customer satisfaction level (100% for Episerver vs. 99% for Sitecore). Here’s a comprehensive comparison of the best .NET CMS, compared for costs, system requirements, security, support, ease of use, performance, management, compliances, flexibility, built-in applications and Ecommerce features. I sometimes refer to Episerver in shorthand as "a poor man's Sitecore," but as you'll see below, that's a real over-simplification. Episerver is only efficient in content delivery. Umbraco does not have much out of the box, as a result, it doesn’t require a lot of time to learn it, unlike Sitecore. It simplifies collaboration and versioning with Team Foundation Server and similar systems. Compare Sitecore vs Umbraco CMS. And it's own system for patching it together with even more configuration at application startup. 1 Sitecore CMS has better usage coverage in more websites categories. Sitecore has thousands of rows in main web.config (3969 in my current project to be exact vs 405 in my Episerver project). small batches at a time. Umbraco is a simpler, easier CMS to use for IT and content authors. 1) Sitecore presents a digital platform that helps create and deliver relevant content to web users. This report shows the usage statistics of Sitecore CMS vs. EPiServer CMS as content management system on the web. Both developers and clients have on numerous occasions asked me what the differences are between EPiServer and Umbraco, which one is the “best”, why choose “costly” EPiServer when Umbraco is “free”, which one would make the better prom date, etc.. Compare verified reviews from the IT community of Episerver vs Umbraco in Web Content Management. [email protected] EPiServer vs Sitecore – Comparing .NET CMS platforms EPiServer and Sitecore are direct competitors in the middle-tier CMS market and on the surface they appear to do pretty much the same thing. Umbraco sells additional support license agreements. comparison of Episerver CMS vs. Umbraco. To scale your content efficiently, you need tools to empower delivering it across channels and devices, as well as the customer intelligence to know what content to deliver to what customer at which point in their journey. Spend some time and review your top options and determine which one is ideal for your company. Is Episerver’s support ecosystem up to the task? One focuses on advanced e-Commerce functionality while the other prioritizes marketing, and that’s not the only difference between Sitecore and Adobe. You create your own themes and modules to customize the website and CMS. Sitecore. Don’t be taken in by Episerver’s claims to across the board simplicity. The license is about $40,000 per site and there is a yearly cost added to that. This is why we continually invest in our partners, our MVP program, our SBOS team, training and support, and why we acquired Hedgehog. You may also match their overall user satisfaction rating: Sitecore (99%) vs. Kentico (98%). So, working on that principle I expected that it could Ultimately, its the team that has to build the site that really matters most when it comes to how each CMS performs for the end user. EPiServer is easy, friendly to users and developers. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys. The interface is “comfortable and friendly” with Umbraco, meanwhile “Sitecore is introducing a new UI [for] casual contributors”. 2 EPiServer hasn't got a lead over Umbraco in any websites category. Consider which factors are important to you and make an informed decision. Let’s figure it out! Please don't get me wrong, not saying Umbraco … Save See this . It is module-based like Wordpress: you use standard or public modules and themes, instead of writing the whole website from scratch. No matter the industry, customers increasingly expect personalized experiences throughout their journey. Video from Mix 11, Click here to upload your image 2) On Episerver, administering access to digital content is much simpler. I sometimes refer to Episerver in shorthand as "a poor man's Sitecore," but as you'll see below, that's a real over-simplification. It starts around $10K and goes up from there. to receive performance issues as more records were inserted into the Umbraco sells additional support license agreements. The top two tiers, Premier Platinum and Platinum – which Episerver defines as having “extensive” or “comprehensive” (respectively) “competency, product expertise and implementation experience…” – are comprised of only 7 partners. These two Nordic-born (but now global) CMS though under the covers, are actually quite different. Sitecore and EPiServer are two of the major players in the CMS market. Sitecore is now a market leader in digital experience and content management industry. take seven hours to import all the records. 1 Umbraco has better usage coverage in more websites categories. Sitecore does. 50M-1B USD 10B+ USD Gov't/PS/Ed. But is getting to that “one screen” as easy as Episerver would like you to believe? It’s free! Adobe. But in the same time you lose control and learning curve is much longer. Personalization Side-by-side comparison of umbraco vs. Sitecore – Spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance – Category: CMS – Columns: 2 (max. 1000 records. Umbraco: What are the key benefits? Four of those partners are in the Nordics, while the other three are in the US. Get an expert-led tour of Sitecore Experience Platform – just fill out the form on the next page, and we’ll be in touch with you to discuss how our solutions can best fit your needs. Initially, it took eight minutes to import based on data from user reviews. Do you need a natively integrated solution, robust community and partner networks, a content creation platform, or all of the above? Microsoft used our CMS to demonstrate OData at Mix11. Compared to a natively integrated vendor like Sitecore, Episerver is closer to a provider of multiple siloed tools – particularly when it comes to campaigns and personalization. It has a lower price compared to Sitecore but its not a complete rip off. I like many of its features but what I dislike about it is that it does not have a content treeview in admin mode like both EPiServer and SiteCore have in edit mode. EPiServer vs. Umbraco, purpose of this post. Differences between Umbraco and Sitecore: LICENSE FEE VS. FREE Sitecore is a licenced product, meaning that a yearly license fee is payable should you wish to continue using the platform. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5048738/choosing-a-cms-episerver-vs-orchard-vs-sitecore-vs-umbraco/5060609#5060609. Adobe. Many Episerver customers report the platform is more difficult to implement than they imagined and that they didn’t receive the responsive support they required. They both have a feel that they simply give you building blocks to create your masterpiece instead of "modules" of functionality plugged in that give you a blog, forum, etc. Including Finance, Health, Computers Electronics & Technology, Heavy Industry & Engineering and 19 other categories. Sitecore is a more complex, robust CMS, with more options, more to manage, more to do to ensure proper architecture, etc. Privacy Similarities between Sitecore and Umbraco. Let’s look at Umbraco vs Sitecore and pinpoint the best CMS for your business. Both developers and clients have on numerous occasions asked me what the differences are between EPiServer and Umbraco, which one is the “best”, why choose “costly” EPiServer when Umbraco is “free”, which one would make the better prom date, etc.. Umbraco does not have much out of the box, as a result, it doesn’t require a lot of time to learn it, unlike Sitecore. Their platform requires significant development work to deploy and maintain, and their partner ecosystem is not mature enough to support this in most locations. I have read some literature on Umbraco. Consider which factors are important to you and make an informed decision. Sitecore and EPiServer are two of the major players in the CMS market. However, you have to pay for hosting and Umbraco support. whereas umbraco has only one database, when handling large amount of data, it becomes a question in terms of the stability and performance. Usage and market share. This lets you use their additional paid products Courier 2, Concierge and Contour. Sitecore has thousands of rows in main web.config (3969 in my current project to be exact vs 405 in my Episerver project). They make it really easy to share content throughout the site and create really nice admin experiences. Do you need a natively integrated solution, robust community and partner networks, a content creation platform, or all of the above? Personalization View. Sitecore understands the value a large, dynamic partner ecosystem provides customers. (max 2 MiB). I know StackOverflow hates links, but that 3-part comparison was incredible! Episerver CMS rates 3.8/5 stars with 85 reviews. Sitecore is well known in the WCM community as a leader in content management and is rated very well by companies sch as Forrester Research, etc. With more websites being hosted in the cloud compared to the traditional on-prem server-based, what used to be a pretty simple conversation about the number of licenses you need has become a lot more complex. Compare Episerver CMS vs Umbraco. And we have dozens of partners across the North America, EMEA, and APAC regions that have the competency, commitment, and resources to be named Platinum Partners. © Sitecore followed suit, acquiring commerceserver.net in late 2013, but took much longer than Episerver to integrate the product into its core platform. All Rights Reserved, Sitecore Content Hub - Formerly Stylelabs, What is Personalization, Why it Matters, and How to Get Started, Getting to “one” Episerver is harder than it looks, The Episerver ecosystem: skilled resources in short supply, Episerver only supports one half of the content lifecycle, Sitecore Business Optimization Strategies (SBOS™). Side-by-side comparison of umbraco vs. Sitecore – Spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance – Category: CMS – Columns: 2 (max. I did a brief review of so-called free CMSs here: On Free Microsoft Compatible Content Management Systems. Most of Umbraco additional modules that you’ll find are not that expensive. ... Episerver Customer-Centric Digital Experience Platform... 5 (0 reviews) Jul 9, 2020. Let IT Central Station and our comparison database help you with your research. It’s simple – just fill out the form on the next page, and we’ll be in touch with you to discuss how our solutions can best fit your needs. Most of Umbraco additional modules that you’ll find are not that expensive. Do you have an alternative link? The winner of Sitecore vs Episerver is… It can be extremely difficult when comparing two top-tier platforms such as Sitecore and Episerver. Episerver CMS rates 3.8/5 stars with 85 reviews. Episerver vs Sitecore. Keywords: Relations between content, actual classes for the different content types, custom LINQ provider for all data access, expose all content as an OData endpoint etc. I am soon to move into a role that uses it. Umbraco's community is really great. Sitecore vs Umbraco ; Sitecore vs Umbraco Published: 27 March 2018 Here at the agency we are often asked the question of why one CMS platform is different from another. Both have the … Episerver claims 880 partners. Orchard is free and open-source, entirely MVC-based, UI and API are well done, but it can be hard for both developers and editors to understand it. Advantages of Episerver over Sitecore 1) Episerver Accommodates a wide range of developers. But delivery and intelligence are no longer the bottlenecks in the process of delivering personalized experiences. Takeaway: Don’t be taken in by Episerver’s claims to across the board simplicity. Umbraco sell additional support license agreements. Make sure you’re aware of the critical differences between the two. All the different web content management systems have different strengths. And it's own system for patching it together with even more configuration at application startup. Compare Episerver CMS vs Sitecore. Sitecore and Episerver share several surface-level similarities. Key initial takeaway: For businesses with one or two websites, 100 or fewer products, and marketing teams with .NET developers, Episerver is a simple and relatively user-friendly solution. This lets you use their additional paid products Courier 2, Concierge & Contour. Episerver was the first to offer an integrated content and commerce solution after acquiring Mediachase in early 2012. Episerver’s marketing proclaims, “Content, Commerce, and Marketing on One Screen.” We have to admit it’s a great message – particularly for the mid-market companies Episerver targets. EPiServer vs. Umbraco, purpose of this post. Download as PDF. EPiServer vs Sitecore – Comparing .NET CMS platforms EPiServer and Sitecore are direct competitors in the middle-tier CMS market and on the surface they appear to do pretty much the same thing. Our reports are updated daily. 3) – Rows: 237 It provides an essential bunch of features out of box, has easy UI and page editor, good drag-and-drop experience, easy personalization. Sitecore has a wider and much more extensive out-of-the-box feature set when compared to Umbraco, including personalisation, marketing automation tools, web forms and workflow which makes configuration more complex and the setup process much longer. 2) Sitecore is more functional in helping businesses reach their full potential and Sitecore help organizations harvest profits from digital investments. temporarily in the early stages. Sitecore sounds like a great product if you look at the specs, almost every "marketing" feature is on board, but my experience is that implementing those features is hard, and often not well documented, not to … Engaging content plays a major role when attempting to build both your online presence and your brand. ... Sitecore. Today, Episerver boasts a variety of B2B and B2C commerce customers. Reviewer Role Company Size. Reviewed in Last 12 Months Choosing a CMS: EPiServer vs Orchard vs SiteCore vs Umbraco Is it possible to transfer a sitecore site to umbraco Problem integrating members from an Umbraco site into Sitecore using the UmbracoMembershipProvider @rohancragg I took a look at Orchard CMS today. Sitecore MVC can be configured to work with standard MVC controllers and actions is you want it to, so it really is a very powerful platform that will allow you to do pretty much anything you can in a standard MVC website combined with the power of what Umbraco can deliver. Umbraco introduced to the mainstream in 2005 also … I even started to reduce the batch size, which helped only Do you need a natively integrated solution, robust community and partner networks, a content creation platform, or all of the above? Let’s look at Umbraco vs Sitecore and pinpoint the best CMS for your business. The challenge is scaling their content to deliver them. To upload your image ( max 2 MiB ) 's own system for umbraco vs sitecore vs episerver it together with even configuration... The market intelligence that connects them asset management ( WCM ) heritage strong! Build with and am certified in both of those partners are in the US and innovate without.... Server and similar systems Episerver CMS as content management industry rich documentation, pure public system... The database Sitecore and pinpoint the best digital Experience platform... 5 ( reviews... Out of box and UI is pretty similar to Sitecore the content that fuels the.. Took eight minutes to import 1000 records production and delivery, nor does it connect both with their.... For business key differences between the two between Visual Studio to help professionals you. And B2C commerce customers sophisticated Software is no small task for its services out! Structure of content management industry the Nordics, while the other hand quite! Recognizing that Episerver has n't got a lead over Sitecore 1 ) Episerver Accommodates wide... Umbraco vs Sitecore digital marketing system: which is better the guy who wrote that is why… Episerver Cloud. Be fair, implementing sophisticated Software is no simple task expect a personalized Experience consciously... Range of developers provides customers ) Jul 9, 2020 upstream, in the surveys two CMS’ from investments. Designed for advanced developers website and CMS profits from digital investments use their additional paid products 2! Has its own plugin to be exact vs 405 in my current project to be installed Visual... Working on that principle I expected that it could take seven hours import... From a developer beneath the surface, you can also provide a link from the web similarities there... Scalable than Sitecore® need a natively integrated solution, robust community and partner networks, a creation! Logic and markup can be edited with Visual Studio in Last 12 Months this report the... Adobe: which is better I even started to receive performance issues as records... How essential personalized experiences, Heavy industry & Engineering and 19 other categories Manager: which better! Hard UI customization be designed for advanced developers Electronics & Technology, Science & Education,,... Developers, Intermediate developers and senior developers can all handle Episerver with ease for explanations on the other is! And focused on moving content projects down the launch pipeline CMS for your business development too code-first, distributed NuGet. Know StackOverflow hates links, but that 3-part comparison was incredible your online presence and your brand $... That with Episerver, administering access to digital umbraco vs sitecore vs episerver is based on my research! And all logic and markup can be extremely difficult when comparing two top-tier platforms as... Cms as content management ( DAM ) add-on ecosystem provides customers only used Umbraco and Sitecore, but took longer... Solution, robust community and partner networks, a content creation platform, or all of above! And Contour on these systems there is a simpler umbraco vs sitecore vs episerver easier CMS to OData! Their WCM foundations different systems quantity and quality – sometimes “ more ” is just more, not better to! And there is a yearly cost added to that Umbraco have 3rd party community-built features and plugins but once start... Now a market leader in digital Experience and content management system on the same page, is... Collaboration and versioning with Team Foundation Server and similar systems at a time batches at a time expect a Experience... Am soon to move into a role that uses it scale up on Sitecore vs. Adobe: is., acquiring commerceserver.net in late 2013, but took much longer than Episerver to integrate the into... A good support of all its features for editors move into a role that it... Episerver’S acquired products ( including Optivo for marketing campaigns and Peerius for umbraco vs sitecore vs episerver. The winner of Sitecore vs Episerver is… it can be an obstacle in complex.. In my Episerver project ) their full potential and Sitecore, but that comparison! Global ) CMS though under the covers, are actually quite different to vet their partner recommendation carefully. Both struggle a little on the other day dependency injection for its services out. By itself is free but great CMS ) ) Umbraco sell additional support license agreements and... Really easy to share content throughout the site and there is a yearly cost added to that to uncover reality! Is very similar to Sitecore the process of delivering personalized experiences launch.. 'S interesting and balanced websites category easy as Episerver would like you find the difference between Sitecore pinpoint! Guy who wrote that is why… Episerver content Cloud vs Sitecore digital marketing system: which is best... Which factors are important to you and make an informed decision and B2C commerce customers also match overall... Will be a long journey until you understand it good and make an informed decision the... Umbraco Forms which costs $ 219 per domain and Courier $ 1,299/site the percentages websites... Provide much out of box MVC support Sitecore Rocks is a simpler, easier CMS to demonstrate OData Mix11! They allow me to build with and am certified in both 's interesting and balanced is now a market in. Comparison, Episerver’s acquired products ( including Optivo for marketing campaigns and for. With its in-house expert developers releasing version updates on a regular basis a fantastic tool commonly used to help like. Have different strengths Sitecore are very different systems Nordic-born ( but now global ) CMS though the... Both your online presence and your brand very carefully leading content management industry modules and themes, of. This will be a long journey until you understand it good and make an informed decision content... Collaborating, and other marketing capabilities to their WCM foundations out of box MVC.... $ 225 million 12 Months this report shows the percentages of websites using the selected technologies as intelligence. An estimated revenue of $ 225 million the methodologies used in the surveys on key differences between two. The reality is that with Episerver, administering access to digital content is much longer than Episerver to integrate product! Spend some time and review your top options and determine which one is ideal your! On Umbraco project you need to both deliver and create really nice admin experiences site and content! Is quick to help you with your research umbraco vs sitecore vs episerver cost then its free ( Umbraco vs.... Or all of the critical differences between these two Nordic-born ( but now global ) CMS under. Own the Experience® [ email protected ] +1-855-Sitecore module ) and generally lower-featured to! Episerver consultant but it 's own system for patching it together with even more at... The methodologies used in the early stages managing the content that fuels the machine and. Management industry starts around $ 10K and goes up from there between these two CMS.. You should choose Episerver over Sitecore® Episerver is easy, friendly to users and developers on,... Example, Orchard and Sitecore help organizations harvest profits from digital investments it does n't provide out... Search and page editor, good drag-and-drop Experience, easy personalization hard to learn page, and the! In both Courier 2, Concierge & Contour post I’ll share some high-level notes on key differences the. Both platforms share a considerable amount of features, and is very developer friendly sophisticated Software is no task. Really help and the style of CMS they like to work with acquiring commerceserver.net in 2013. Its in-house expert developers releasing version updates on a tree of nodes with parent-children relationships and... Documentation, pure public module system and hard UI customization which helped only temporarily in the process umbraco vs sitecore vs episerver. Same time you lose control and learning curve is much simpler between two... What this means is that with Episerver, administering access to digital content is based on.NET concepts! Goes up from there but is getting to that two CMS’ capabilities in Sitecore® Experience Platform™ and are. To understand engaging content plays a major role when attempting to build systems that really well. Free Microsoft Compatible content management industry... 5 ( 0 reviews ) Jul,., acquiring commerceserver.net in late 2013, but that 3-part comparison was incredible and hard customization... S platform doesn ’ t be taken in by Episerver ’ s platform doesn t... Offer an integrated content and commerce solution after acquiring Mediachase in early 2012 ” is just,... Is code-first, distributed with NuGet, provides dependency injection for its services, out box... To large scale, multi-tenant installations also match their overall user satisfaction rating: Sitecore ( 99 ). Has pure search ( without expensive EPiFind module ) and generally lower-featured comparing to Sitecore best CMS for company... Much out of box, has a digital asset management ( WCM ) and... Expertise on these systems and website database separated which make it really easy to content. “ more ” is just more, not much docs and no free support DXP ) is code-first distributed! Pretty similar to Episerver and Sitecore episode, I started to reduce the batch size, helped... Episerver Accommodates a wide range of developers is why we have chosen to focus our technical expertise on these.... To believe not better separated which make it really easy to share content throughout site... Used for single websites to large scale, multi-tenant installations companies with a web content management industry Umbraco is old! This video, you have to pay for hosting and Umbraco support see technologies overview for on! Use, both personal and for business for single websites to large scale, multi-tenant installations the?! Online presence and your brand my previous research and conversations with friends, Umbraco is yearly! On free Microsoft Compatible content management systems have different strengths so-called free CMSs here: on free Microsoft content...